LEE KRAMER'S ROOM: With Views

[jbsliverer]

1) Regardless of whether it's a family law Court, or the Supreme Court, the judicial system repeatedly demonstrates that it is ill-equipped to deal with Cluster B Personality-Disordered people.

...and....

2) The majority and dissenting opinions/positions seem to boil down to whether they are afraid of what a Trump-like (Cluster B) person will do AS PRESIDENT without any guardrails on his behavior (Dissenting justices' opinion).....

....or whether they're afraid of what a Trump-like person will do TO FUTURE FORMER PRESIDENTS.... ("I am your retribution").

The former is the position of the minority/dissent, and the latter is the position of the majority.

The former/dissent is essentially protecting the country from Trump.

The latter is essentially protecting the presidency (those who previously held the office) from Trump.

Obviously, the motivations of some of the Justices are questionable, at best, and may not fit neatly or nobly into this analysis, but the result of either judicial position creates vulnerability.

The bottom line is that once again it is evident that the constitution is not capable of protecting the country from someone as pathological as Trump.

As I wrap my head around the Supreme Court's immunity decision.....a couple of things seem to stand out.https://t.co/boe9v6DByK

1) Regardless of whether it's a family law Court, or the Supreme Court, the judicial system repeatedly demonstrates that it is ill-equipped to deal… pic.twitter.com/AhjWmIeZJP

— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) July 4, 2024

.