Wednesday, July 03, 2024 10:03:37 AM
Pretty much the only reason the FDA ever gives for rejecting a 510(k).....
"Failure to prove substantial equivalence to a predicate device."
Because that's all a 510(k) has to do.
How can you not know this?
BIEL chose a predicate device cleared for blepharasty. They needed to choose a predicate device cleared for musculoskeletal pain if they wanted clearance for musculoskeletal pain.
In my J&J example, J&J would choose a predicate device -- the ActiPatch -- that was cleared for musculoskeletal pain. In my example, I'm asking you to imagine if BIEL had that advantage "way back then."
I tire of this. Never mind, you go Slap That Ask now.
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • BLO • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM