InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 50
Posts 5146
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2016

Re: newman2021 post# 703310

Tuesday, 07/02/2024 2:10:17 PM

Tuesday, July 02, 2024 2:10:17 PM

Post# of 707543

Because you can't come up with an RFI example/history/precedence that came after 150 days of an application.



Tell me how to comb this data and I'll find some for you.

Conversely, can you please give me some examples of MAA's that did not receive an RFI at all? By your logic, if you cannot, it means that an RFI is always required.

Here, allow me to dispute every sentence of yours.

She said the 150 day clock started right after Jan 24th.

She did not say this. Factually incorrect.

You are fuding RFI so that you can fearmonger approval comes after a minimum 60 days since the date of the RFI

I only repeated what LP said. That they are preparing for and expect an RFI. That's not me saying it, that's the CEO of the company. Send her an angry letter and call her a blowhard.

No, there is no precedence of RFI came in after 150 days of filing.

100% made up speculation with no data to support it.

Sawston has been inspected multiple times for the artisan method which secured us the Global Manufacturing Permit; so, there is no more inspection for the approval we are seeking

Absolute speculation based on zero facts.

There is nothing more MHRA wants to complete the review and make the decision.

Blatant lie. Multiple more inspections and discussions will take place. LP confirmed in the ASM.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News