With such a protocol, you can achieve triple masking (patient + investigator + outcome assessor) but not quadruple masking (triple masking + surgeon). Whether this distinction is material to the integrity of a trial is open to question.
Edit: Just saw iwfal's reply to the same post, and I concur that a sham non-injection may not be adequately masked to the patient.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.