InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 197
Posts 24669
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: iclight post# 693503

Thursday, 05/23/2024 9:34:27 AM

Thursday, May 23, 2024 9:34:27 AM

Post# of 700247
And I said I knew it was there and never denied it. That I let you and shorts post the SUBSEQUENT IA but used the case to explain it is not “unblinding” and specifically qualified it as up to that point, and that it provides a good explanation for how it works, and then took the language from that very JAMA report and gave you the explanation for why their use of it there to adjust their statistics PROVES just how rock solid the trial is.

But you persist at your false effort to suggest I did not know. But anyone with a brain can go back and see that ExW and I have touched on this before.

The court case was up to that point, as I qualified, but it explains the nature of such exercises including when the IA goes beyond safety only.

It’s not unblinding, and there is a statistical adjustment, which was done.

Why must you remain so dense. Right, it’s a job.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174470336

I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News