InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 20252
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/04/2011

Re: quester614 post# 31864

Wednesday, 05/15/2024 4:49:38 PM

Wednesday, May 15, 2024 4:49:38 PM

Post# of 32338
"This will surely be brought up in the lawsuit." Why?
You expect XTI to raise it as at issue as defense in the lawsuit, where XTI 1.) signed the JV Agreement contract anyway, 2.) did not issue default notice, 3.) took $Millions in dollars more from Xeriant, 4.) used those funds to hire a large workforce, 5.) completed the PDR, and 6.) maintained the JV for its entire 2 year term until the JV expired under it natural terms.

Knowing all this you expect the jury will find this of issue. Why?
(oh yeah, a jury).

Why?, will the $310.880 initial payment paid rather than full $1M be any make or break (or any) issue to the jury, that you claim it a certain maybe that: "It may be the only thing that saves XTI from Duffy taking part of them like he tried to do to HALO."

Seems stupid to me.

But, like everything else you claim and then avoid any or any reasonable explanation, can you this time actually state why with any reasonable logical explanation?

Or do we continue to receive word from your massive cricket collection?

_____

Regarding "I am surprised MovyChem hasn't sued Duffy for trying to steal Retacell/Nexboard."

Why, I thought you stated it was all a scam anyway?

So actually then consider Movychem legit?

So Xeriant was punking Movychem the entire time, and apparently has stolen its Retacell IP.

_____


Of course, all this wwhhhaaaaaaaa wwwhhaaaa wwaayyy above JohnFakerDoe2024's capability to understand hence his default is he searching out crybabies whom he keeps looking for who sound just like him.

.

© 2024, by StockItOut

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent XERI News