InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 20206
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: Canna_Business post# 86238

Tuesday, 05/14/2024 10:52:37 PM

Tuesday, May 14, 2024 10:52:37 PM

Post# of 87024
This in two parts. First is a hypothesis from the 1990s that believed that SIDS was connected to EMF (electromagnetic fields). Second is a recent study that indicates seizure activity in toddlers before SUDC (SIDS for children). Consider for a moment a sleeping infant or toddler in an EV. The constant EMF exposure could potentially lead to seizure and death while the child is asleep in their carseat. I just added a study indicating that 3% of SIDS occurs in a sitting device with 63% of those being in a carseat and 51% of those in the home. Id watch for an increase in SIDS/SUDC in relation to EV exposure.

Magnetic influences on fetus and infant as reason for sudden infant death syndrome: a new testable hypothesis

If such an infant with a functional disturbance of the control organ is then exposed to a GMF or EMF with pulsations similar to his own breathing frequency, but inverted in phase, value, form etc then the vital nerve impulses from the respiration control organ to the breathing organs may be disturbed or blocked with fatal effect.


The study findings come from a registry of more than 300 SUDC cases, set up a decade ago by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Researchers used extensive medical record analysis and video evidence donated by families to document the inexplicable deaths of seven toddlers between the ages of 1 and 3 that were potentially attributable to seizures. These seizures lasted less than 60 seconds and occurred within 30 minutes immediately prior to each child’s death, say the study authors.



Combining the hypthesis with the study suggest that the EMF exposure is causing seizures in the infants and children before they die in their sleep. Not just any EMF exposure but potentially the right frequencies that then interfere with nerve impulses. If frequency is a major player here then that means each individual would likely be susceptible to different frequencies making it harder to define which EM frequencies cause the most problems for the overall population. Blanket studies may not work when trying to better understand why EMF seems to cause problems for some and not others.

Of deaths in sitting devices, 62.9% were in CSSs, and in these cases, the CSS was used as directed in <10%. Among all sitting-device deaths, 81.9% had =1 risk factor, and 54.9% had =2 risk factors. More than half (51.6%) of deaths in CSSs were at the child’s home.


CSS = Car safety seats. This suggests mosts of the deaths occurred in the home and not in the car. Itd be interesting if these statistics shift more toward the vehicle in EVs/hybrids.

Quote Sources:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1614359/
https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-identify-potential-cause-of-sudden-unexplained-death-in-children/
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/144/1/e20182576/37087/Infant-Deaths-in-Sitting-Devices?

========================================

The following photos show the various sources of man-made EM radiation coming from Electric Vehicles and their autonomous feature sets.


https://emrabc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/automobileEMFMetsis2017.jpg


https://emfinspections.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/electric-high-res.jpg

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent TSLA News