I am not too much worried about some of the posters here. I think many of those have not been in business. They look backward and are risk averse. I see it as a form of entertainment.
Every business plan in whatever business is based on market predictions and expectations, belief in own organizational capabilities, likely competitor moves. All is fluid and requires adaptive forward planning. It’s what makes business and equally what makes investing in business.
That’s why we are here, because we believe and expect the business plan to be executed successfully.
Investing also requires the ability to deal with ambiguity, complexity, pro’s and con’s and to adapt to changing circumstances.
Especially when you invest in an innovative ( unique) and disruptive technology in an established trillion dollar industry you need to understand the industry dynamics and the huge financial implications for all industry participants, both positive and negative.
My hope is that the industry financial specialist at the large investment banks are well aware of the Lightwave opportunity and don’t kill a promising technology for the USA and the globe. The messengers here (including myself) are currently being played. I hope the good guys win and that Lightwave gets the opportunity to execute its plan successfully.The upside is ‘limitless’ and the downside is small and becoming absolutely less interesting financially by the day.
I firmly belief in the expectations and believes as put down in the recent 10Q, contrary to some of our backward looking messengers.
In fact if you can only look backward you shouldn’t invest at all. Investing by looking backward is really for dummies. Everyone had the right to express his or her opinion of course, but being ‘ critical’ based on the past doesn’t add any value for the shareholders.
The first big deal and most ‘ critical’ messengers will disappear faster than the speed of light, except GP of course.
