InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 20170
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/04/2011

Re: quester614 post# 31706

Thursday, 05/09/2024 4:54:59 PM

Thursday, May 09, 2024 4:54:59 PM

Post# of 32263
Yes. The evidence that: $1M was not initially paid, that some initial payment was made, further payments were made, all parties agree approximately $5.6M from Xeriant was paid to fund the actual completion of the preliminary design review of the TriFan 600.

All this shows that an agreement was made or accepted to continue under the contract of the JV even with less than $1M as the initial Xeriant payment, therefore then the evidence evidences that they could reduce and that they did reduce the initially agreed $1M first payment to a lesser payment amout.


What do you have as evidence?

To demand that "they couldn't REDUCE the $1 mil down payment" on its face seems glaringly incorrect.

Further, you provide zero reasonable or logical explanation and/or evidence to support your claim that Eco Aero, LLC "couldn't REDUCE the $1 mil down payment."

Yes they could. And they did. And everyone agreed. The existing evidence quite readily shows.



Funny thing is, JohnFAKERDoe2024 reads this and gets caught-up on details of the issues while he cries he's such a cool dude and slings insults as his only remaining communication ability.

.

© 2024, by StockItOut

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent XERI News