InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 275
Posts 32579
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2013

Re: RobotDroid post# 689786

Wednesday, 05/08/2024 4:54:55 PM

Wednesday, May 08, 2024 4:54:55 PM

Post# of 693695
In the end, I don’t think it matters if “ucla’s” autologous dc was manufactured exactly like the phase iii DCVax-l monotherapy trial, the point is that DCVax technology is licensed by NWBO, including the DC + poly trial. The point is poly-iclc helps DC therapy work better.
The point is, we have a license that gives us the privilege to commercialize. My guess, is that DCVax-l as it was made for the DCVax-l trial, is slightly better than the UCLA lab grade version for the dc + poly trial, and my guess is that the NWBO Eden version, which is better at selecting and collecting healthy and activated dendritic cells, while substantially the same as artisan DCVax-l, is slightly better/purer than artisan. My guess is that Eden’s DCVax-l + poly-iclc will provide even better results.

There was a white paper written a decade or so ago by the UK’s Royal Society, and in it, the author(s) foresaw immunotherapy manufacturing continuing to improve purity/selection during the decade or so of any given phase/1/2/3 trials for a particular immunotherapy, and they suggested to treat this like medicine trials treat dosing selection. Analogous. Aka: improving purity/selection is akin to titrating the best dose strength.

I kinda think EX and views opposite him are all missing the point.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News