>>>Another one with obsessions with posters and refuses to talk about the company and the financial state it is in? ONLY emphasis on posters.<<<
My past posts are for all to see which detail what I like and don’t like about the company. Guess you missed it. They reflected on some of the very things you incessantly repeat. However, my position has changed since the passage of the NOPAIN Act & CMS Insurance reimbursement being on the radar from now until 1/1/2025, and for whatever might happen in the interim. I’ve been clear that there are no guarantees for BIEL, nor that it is guaranteed that BIEL will not benefit from these two pending items.
Unlike you, I don’t make generalized nonsense statements like “it's the NO PAIN ACT that will save us” for purposes of mocking BIEL. I simply think it’s a good possibility that shareholders will benefit and have extensively written why enough times. Other than that, and which I’ve stated in the past, I would not likely be invested at all, or minimally so. Conversely, I have increased my position substantially within the last month given NPA/CMS as a hedge for anything that may positively develop in the interim.
Your take that Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) is fake is about the company because it is about Dr, Ilfeld’s study which is about BIEL and our product that showed remarkable reduction for PLP.
If you think PLP is fake, then by extension you conveniently dismiss Dr.Ilfeld’s remarkable findings and amazing results for what has puzzled many a researcher in terms of pain reduction for PLP.
It is you who avoids taking about this very issue and sticks to a very rigid script as a means to detract from BIEL and especially their product in regards to PLP.
So, in talking about the company, is your stance still that PLP is fake? Is it that the PLP population was not worthy of this study given their numbers relative to other physical conditions? And lastly, what is your take on Dr. Ilfeld’s clinical trial results given the use of BIEL’s products?
