InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 4598
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/25/2006

Re: Monroe1 post# 232516

Monday, 04/29/2024 11:08:27 AM

Monday, April 29, 2024 11:08:27 AM

Post# of 232662
Imo, the use of Liquidmetal in a dental product was a success. The failure was with Zyris products to succeed and expand. No cost comparisons were ever published by LQMT. No updates as to why Zyris stopped expanding the use of Liquidmetal. Whether Liquidmetal was beneficial or not or whether the costs of the new material outweighed the benefits of it’s use.

It’s a huge problem when contracting with companies who may not have the financial means to incorporate a more costlier material. Another huge problem imo, is relying on a company abroad to fulfill any customer contract orders. In this case if the government of China shuts down the amorphous metal industry for a specific customer then LQMT could be in serious trouble along with the value of all who roll the dice.

The move to manufacture in China from the USA is just as important a factor for a company to do business with LQMT. Just as waiting for a high volume order to be filled. There are no back up manufacturers in this case. This makes it imo, more difficult to obtain contracts. You can ink a deal but there is no control to fulfill it.

Another reason why deep pockets avoid doing business imo.

I think the same scenario played out with the ring. But now with financing there is a possibility for that company to grow and orders increase. The success is now like Zyris, it’s up to movano to succeed.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News