InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 745
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/01/2014

Re: Dyno89 post# 197654

Sunday, 04/28/2024 10:04:45 PM

Sunday, April 28, 2024 10:04:45 PM

Post# of 198205
How does the SAGA deal only include VIRO and not BGEN? If the deal was not legally completed (I don't believe it was) why is it that only the VIRO assets of the business combination agreement would be returned to ENZC? Why are the BGEN assets allowed to break free after a failed SPAC business combination agreement and not be returned to ENZC? How is the SPAC allowed to miss an extension deadline and then skip follow-up extension filings (and payments), but then be allowed to pretend they completed their business combination agreement? There were other filings and requirements they were delinquent on as well. Isn't this against their articles of inception? Does contract law matter at all?