InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 1812
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2009

Re: Dyno89 post# 197526

Friday, 04/26/2024 11:01:50 AM

Friday, April 26, 2024 11:01:50 AM

Post# of 198993
It was very clear on their public website, they claimed ENZC ownership of the patents and work product, both Clone3 and Clone7 were specifically named as ENZC products, not a licensing agreement or a lease from Charles.
If Harry allowed something stupid, like, 'as long as Charles was a major shareholder, they could advertise Clone3 and Clone7 as ENZC's own products, but if Charles signed over his shares back to the company, he could leave with all of the IP and BGEN would be an empty shell now for certain. I just can't believe even this group would be that stupid.

And on the Emerging Business Video Conference, Charles himself said ENZC owned the IP's and exclusive Patent rights. He was bragging that way directly to potential investors.

Something is criminal here, can't tell if it was criminal stupidity, or CC and Chandra's exit. Maybe ENZC has it, but it's not illegal for CC and Chandra to compete with the same stuff. They've got to come forward, answer to this, and explain the 'how' it all happened. Hard to believe, Harry, 80 or not, would sit back and see his work stolen away. Chandra did not develop Clone3/7.