I can guarantee you Charles got Clone 3/7 whatever it is out and Chandra followed. The safe harbor statements protect them from anything stated in a PR at the time it’s issued. Things change. Just because they were hopeful of something in a year or two old PR and stated specific things at the time, doesn’t mean when things don’t pan out or go south that they are liable after the fact for defrauding. You’d have to prove purposeful intent to defraud, which is basically impossible. Every PR has those safe harbor statements at the end to protect the company should things not go as planned at the time of the PR.
Just from the recent PR:
“Safe Harbor Statement: This news release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties associated with financial projections, budgets, milestone timelines, clinical development, regulatory approvals, and other risks described by Enzolytics, Inc. from time to time in its periodic reports filed with the SEC.
While Enzolytics, Inc. believes that the forward-looking statements and underlying assumptions contained therein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, including, but not limited to, the ability of Enzolytics to identify acquisition targets and formulate a business strategy for implementation. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this release will prove to be accurate.
Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations. They involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including factors that could delay, divert or change any of the statements made, and cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from current expectations. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release.
