InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 127
Posts 5372
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/09/2020

Re: GermanCol post# 686997

Thursday, 04/25/2024 4:04:27 AM

Thursday, April 25, 2024 4:04:27 AM

Post# of 688989
Very sorry to hear this GermanCol. YOU are one of my absolute favourite posters. I don't think you ever wrote a post, that was not part of that days best due diligence.

I can understand you. I can understand those who say your decision is emotional based. I am in groups, where some of the most hardcore defendants of NWBO and management are showing signs of "wear and tear" and are litteraly "pissed".

I am pissed too. But for me its just, where do I direct "that anger"? Who are the actual recepients for the situation we have?

Beyond all doubt, NWBO has been "harassed" for better part of a decade by collaborative forces, whether that is Market Makers, hedges, shorters, Adam feuerstein, affiliated non dislosure doctors of competing companies and treatments and a small army of stock board pawns who do their best to direct sentiment to the shitter on all places, where NWBO is debated.

It is only to debate in the minds of the legions of paid shill bashers.

Question is, how should NWBO act upon this.

They have tried, in a distant past, to inform retailers. Information that got skewered, distorted and found its way into Adam Feuerstein +40 hit pieces, that got further "picked up" by the stock board army and fudded around and sometimes even found its way into idiotic lawsuits, that took up time, effort and resources for NWBO.

When Linda Liau was on Al Musellas Webinar, the presentation got stopped immediately on Facebook, the presentation taken down immediately by Al Musella and only within weeks again put up, because someone threatened with litigation. So the Q&A, containing a lot of information, that refuted a lot of the fud narratives, we have been blessed with since then - was suddenly no where to be found ... but the video some of us have saved and the screenshots from it.

The case is, that we are up against incredible powerful and financially empowered forces and that the company have made a decision, that not saying anything, will not be able to be used against them. That includes leaving retailers in the dark.

If they don't have anything of material, substantial POSITIVE news to inform about. Don't!

Consider this and tell me, WHAT are the odds that anyone would accuse NWBO of misinforming or in any way having broken rules for informing retailers? It could very well end in yet another lawsuit, that takes up time, money and effort. Just what they want. Playing right into the hands of yet another fud narrative.

During the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) approval period, pharmaceutical companies must adhere to strict regulations regarding what information they can share about the product pending approval. This includes communications with retailers or the general public.

Under these regulations, companies are restricted from promoting or making claims about the safety, efficacy, or marketing of the product until it has received official approval. The primary reason for this is to ensure that all public information about a drug is accurate and substantiated by the MHRA's assessment, preventing misinformation and protecting public health.

However, companies can share factual, non-promotional information about the product, such as its development status, the progress of the MAA, and general scientific findings that are not directly linked to the promotional claims about the product's benefits or risks. For example, they might inform retailers about the submission of the MAA or general updates on the approval process timeline without making specific claims about the product's potential success or market availability.

Such communications must be carefully managed to avoid crossing into promotional territory, which could be viewed as a breach of regulatory guidelines. Therefore, while not completely restricted from discussing the product, companies must navigate these rules carefully to remain compliant with MHRA regulations.



Yes, they could inform about something ... but the case still is ... a hoax lawsuit could still be made on doing this, even though it had nothing substantially to it and then .. time, money, effort.


NWBO need a bigger bang, to be able to leave this cesspool of circumstances behind. If they await approval, NICE statement, Flaskworks Eden approval, then wait with ASM, till they are able to announce that.

I sincerely understand how this disillusion retailers. I am utterly pissed too. But I just don't believe there are any better alternatives for countering this massive collective effort being concerted against NWBO on all levels. It is not bettered by trying to inform retailers in an approval period.

That's all for my part.

I wish you best GermanCol. You were never bad at english smile
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News