Enzolytics Inc (ENZC)

[archilles]

A judge will decide that.

If any employee including a CEO develops a clone 3 while he was employed under the company name ENZC and got paid by ENZC, Clone 3 is belonged to the company, NOT the individual because his name is on it, especiaily when Clone 3 falls under the same category of the type of products that being worked on by ENZC

Similarly, Chandra's AI patent is also belonged to ENZC because he developed this AI while he was employed by ENZC. Chandra's AI product falls in the same category of what ENZC was working on

Whatever an employee develops while being employed by ENZC, that drug is belonged to the company ENZC, NOT the individual.

That is the policy what I have been told by my company.

I strongly believe a judge will see to it.

Now we need a lawyer to defend this. Who here are in? Our lawyer will send a notification to Charles and Chandra to let them know that they cannot just simply run away with the the products that we shareholders helped them develop with our investing monies.

They would not have abandoned ENZC if they were legally aware of this