InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 331
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2023

Re: Number sleven post# 423396

Thursday, 04/18/2024 9:00:48 PM

Thursday, April 18, 2024 9:00:48 PM

Post# of 426729
I entirely disagree (respectfully).

Amarin altered in the lab EPA into E-EPA for a valid, patented reason. They in the patents even cite other possible indications. Keep in mind number sleven, E-EPA, a chemical composition could have negatively or positively affected the EPA moiety. Amarin clearly did early studies which led them to the Ethyl Ester version, and for a REAL reason.

In a court of law, a lawyer, an astute lawyer would have argued EPA is not E-EPA, as the chemistry is not the same, and it's not the same. If you cannot see how a lawyer cannot argue EPA is not E-EPA, then I wonder in due respect. A Lincoln is not a Mercury though made by the same firm.

Hikma lawyers focused on the prior art of EPA, not E-EPA. I think Marjac would side with me, as would other lawyers. But let's keep the discussion going. All the best!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News