ViaDerma Inc (VDRM)

[gameccks1]

It is obvious that I was not clear enough. I only believe the CEO compensation clause regarding % of revenue for contracts he brings to company is egregious and indefensible. The others are not unreasonable. I fully support the incentive for reaching $1.00/share. However, giving himself 30% or 40% of revenue off of the top will be a massive drag on share price appreciation and potential to hit $1.00 with large contracts because new investors and speculators are going to have the advantage of being able to take that into account. The below analysis accepts original poster's premises (without contention) for this analysis. The second column depicts the potential impact of "CEO bonus" to the analysis. Hopefully, realized contracts will be all or mostly by sales people so that bonus clause is non-impactive. I still hope CEO comes through for all of us shareholders, in addition to just MASSIVELY for himself.