HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[NoMoDo]

I read it completely when it came out. I hinted a few posts ago that there was a confidentiality agreement attached. Neither party can discuss the terms publicly. Foote doesn't want Sharp to badmouth him or HMBL after the W.

So now, FORW (Sharp) hired lawyers and filed a complaint. HMBL got their lawyers involved. Adversarial relationship at this point. You contend that Foote just gave Sharp his money back because the stock tanked. Yet in a lawsuit, you need to specify a cause of action - someone must have done some thing legally unacceptable. Stock falling is not a legal cause of action. BUT, breach of fiduciary duty is. As is breach of contract. Especially if something like toxic debt was discussed as part of the resignation AND the rehire of Sharp. It was likely brought up when FORW paid $2mil to exercise those warrants with certain assurances.

If Sharp quit because of things like toxic debt, it wouldn't make sense for him to come back without certain assurances. If he were to invest (provide $2mil in funding) in HMBL, he would logically need those assurances.

But yea, maybe the lawyers for HMBL have no clue that "my stock went down so I can sue you" is not an adequate cause of action. Cmon... you are just baiting me to call you names again.