InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 23764
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/23/2016

Re: WolfofMia post# 453433

Tuesday, 03/05/2024 10:08:05 AM

Tuesday, March 05, 2024 10:08:05 AM

Post# of 458857
The point of course is explaining that plasma abeta 42/40 ratio isn't an accepted biomarker of amyloid load, PET scan is!

In the Lecanemab trial a key secondary endpoint was indeed the change in amyloid burden on PET, not plasma abeta 42/40. So Anavex comparing something not accepted to something not accepted may be indicative, but not conclusive. Especially since establishing PET amyloid burden at baseline was not a mandatory inclusion criteria in the P2b/3 trial and there is no baseline nor is any endpoint measure of PET amyloid burden. There was in the Lecanemab trial!

Hope you get it now or was it just an honest deflection?

Anavex is pretending to legitimise abeta 42/40 ratio as a biomarker and making a meal of something that will be a regulatory side note.

The longer we wait, the sooner we will get rich!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News