I'm just starting to get the picture. Is the Israeli company using their technology.
I frankly hate to think that Ford will incorporate their technology by having it used by the Chinese, but frankly it's better that they pay for it than steal it, which they potentially could do.
If it's easily incorporated into batteries of any form factor, I would think that every manufacturer would want to license it, that would be huge. Would they be making the thin film, or licensing it to others to do so. If the thin film can already be produced in large quantities it sounds like the entire industry could be quickly converted to using these batteries. The question is, do they geometrically keep their current battery configuration and greatly increase the range of their vehicles, or do they reduce the size and weight of their batteries and keep or slightly enhance the range of the vehicles. Frankly to my way of thinking 500 to 600 miles a day would be plenty, especially when I could charge up at most hotels where I might be speaking. If I'm understanding what's being said, with say 3/4ths the batteries a car that currently does 300 miles would be good for about 500 with a substantial space and weight reduction.
Am I getting the picture right. I don't know if one or more MM's were holding sells to the ask price, but I couldn't acquire a single share until I paid at the ask. Normally when I place a good sized order within $.001 of the ask I get at least a partial fill, but that wasn't the case today. If the MM's know something big is coming I like the fact that they wouldn't take anything less.
Gary
Bullish
