InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 101
Posts 13506
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: tdbowieknife post# 77905

Saturday, 02/24/2024 11:16:33 AM

Saturday, February 24, 2024 11:16:33 AM

Post# of 81709
Feel free to sticky

Excuse me I just happen to notice that Walther was not convicted of a crime nor was he ban being a CEO of a penny stock but Ronny J. Halperin, has been.

Are you making the claim that Walther WAS a victim.of a criminal take over?

You posted this

On January 15, 2009, pursuant to the a written resolution of a majority of the outstanding shareholders of the Company, Marc Walther was removed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and all other capacities for cause and Ronny J Halperin was elected to serve as the Company’s sole director, president and secretary.





But you seem to conveniently left Ronnie Halperin was a CONVICTED conman

IT ISFIJRTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that,pursuanttoSection21(d)(2)of
theExchangeAct(15 U.S.C.j78u(d)(2))and Section 20(e)ofthe SecuritiesAct(15U.S.C
j77t@)),Halperin is prohibited,for a period of five years from the date of entry ofthis
judgment,from acting as an officer ordirectorof any issuerthathas a class ofsecurities

registeredpursuanttoSection 12oftheExchangeAct(15U.S.C.j781)orthatisrequiredtofile
reportspursuanttoSection 15(d)oftheExchangeAct(15U.S.C.j78o
IT IS FURTH ER O RDERED AND A DJUD G ED thatHalperin is perm anently barred
from participating in an offering ofpenny stock,
including engaging in activities with a broker,
dealer,orissuerforpurposesofissuing,trading,orinducing orattem pting to induce thepurchase
or sale ofany penny stock. A penny stock isany equity security thathas a price of lessthan five
dollars,exceptasprovidedinRule3a51-1undertheExchangeAct(17C.F.R.240.3a51-1)



https://www.sec.gov/files/Judg12-cv-21656Halperin.pdf

Certainly appears that Walther was a victim of criminal take over,
BTW didn't that company go out of business after Walther's was forced out?

I see you also listed the Vito V. Florio vs case but you purposely left out Joseph Scivoletto name,a person who was also named in that case.name in you posted.

You remember Joseph Scivoletto, the person also responsible for voting for the preferred shares Adestein claimed to be the reason he was defrauded in the first case you cite.

But was never named in Adelstein suit and actually became a partner with Adelstein and when they were forced out of Supreme Energy they took Supreme's Energy trade secrets with them and started a clone company together..

Two other things I notice in the Vito Vs case you post the complaint but don't post the judgement , is there a reason for that?

The other, why is that you ALWAYS PURPOSELY LEAVING OUT THAT WALTHER SETTLED HIS DEBT WITH ADELSTEIN FROM THE FIRST CASE YOU CITED
Judgement: $397,744.50
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nZjmmsmCwJlFwm9TR6NvokHH1H3K01uK/view?usp=sharing

PEOPLE OF GOOD CHARACTER PAID THEIR DEBTS NOT RUN AWAY FROM THEM.


Sorry but you really done post like a person looking for truth!

Just someone that adding to the lie.