InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 644
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/22/2024

Re: pioneertec post# 4481

Thursday, 02/22/2024 7:28:22 PM

Thursday, February 22, 2024 7:28:22 PM

Post# of 6810
Incorrect.

This case you quote was from the previous building owner. It expired because Holcomb were evicted, hence lack of prosecution by the Plaintiff in this matter, as it did not need to anymore.

This has nothing to do with the matter of Kelmar Realty Holdings Inc., where the Plaintiff is the owner of the current building where Holcomb are tenants and has also lent $1.5m to the Defendant Holcomb, this case is still in play and has not been chucked out.

Case No. 2023 CA004728NC - Circuit Court. Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County, FL. Please check for your own reference.

I understand it is confusing with all the court matters against Holcomb but please do not muddy the waters here; eviction action is still active. Thank you.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ASRE News