Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[crescentmotor]

Subsequently the company said something about having no control over the peer-review process -- not "no control over the journal's timing of the publication date" -- which leads me to believe it hasn't yet been accepted.

If the full data hasn't even been accepted for peer review, then that pretty much, in my opinion, would indicate this whole peer review saga has been nothing more than an extraordinary delay/diversion. Let's hope this is not the case. This is another classic example of the lack of precision in AVXL's (Missling's) communications. I just finished re-reading the recorded transcript from the February conference call. Out of the dozens of similar calls that I have listened to over the past twenty-five years, that conference call was the most non-reassuring and confusing call of its kind. Missling's comments were off-point, vague, non-precise, and incomplete, thus causing no end to various interpretations. The frustration of the two participating analysts and their comments was so obvious with their repeated attempts to gain some clarity. Any time a call like that results in more questions than answers, there is an obvious problem. So is the problem one of incompetency/unprofessionalism or one of deceit?