InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 101
Posts 13556
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: tdbowieknife post# 77488

Friday, 02/16/2024 8:54:36 PM

Friday, February 16, 2024 8:54:36 PM

Post# of 82124
You know when post are full bull is when they try to make a point and only tell you part of the story.

Take the post I am responding to.

Ask your self why only provide half the the Abstract (the part in red is the remaining part he purposely left out)

ABSTRACT
The efficacy of a feed supplement fed to gilts and sows was tested in
study I. The supplement was stated to improve reproductive soundness,
conception rates, immune health, and overall well-being of livestock. Thirty gilts
were split into a control group (Base diet) and a treatment group (Absorbezz®
0.32 mL on base diet). Upon completion of the trial results indicate the treatment
group significantly underperformed (<0.05) when compared to the control group,
thus disproving the hypothesis claimed by the feed supplement.

Two commercially available show pig growing rations were tested in study
II to find a high quality, cost efficient product. A total of 10 pigs (5 barrows, 5
gilts), at an average weight of 60 lbs., were fed to market weight, with data
recorded for feed efficiency and carcass quality. No significant differences
(< 0.05) were discovered between the two rations
. A larger sample size could
adjust results


I wonder why the poster didn't want you to know this information.