Impact Fusion International Inc (IFUS)

[drugmanrx]

ROFLMAO!

Open your eyes! You really should read the reports before you post them

The efficacy of a feed supplement fed to gilts and sows was tested in
study I. The supplement was stated to improve reproductive soundness,
conception rates, immune health, and overall well-being of livestock.

Conclusion Study 1

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Absorbezz® on the
reproductive performance

The sample size from this study was too small and resulted in a Type II error and statistically
cannot claim that the supplement and mastic gum do not improve reproductive
performance

Further research should include a larger sample size and focus on sows as it may provide more consistent results on
conception rates and reproductive efficiency. Blood samples should also be taken to measure the levels of the supplement throughout the trial and see the
effect on the piglets as well..

SO STUDY ONE INCONCLUSIVE:

Conclusion Study 2

The feeding trial compared the performance of two quality show feeds
available at two different costs to see which feed could be the best investment.
The parameters measured in this trial were average daily gain and feed
conversion for feed efficiency measures and for carcass data carcass weight,
dressing percentage, loin eye area, and percent lean.
Feed A, the more costly feed, resulted with the more efficient FCR as it
resulted in a pen average (6.64lbs. of feed/ 1lb. of gain) and feed B resulted in a
pen average of (7.54lbs. of feed/ lb. of gain). Average total intake for Feed A
was 281.72 lbs. and for Feed B it was 278.83lbs., breaking that down further both
pens averaged a daily intake of 2.5lbs.
Hot carcass weight was recorded from the 10 pigs and Feed A presented
the largest carcass weight average 212.1 (±11.62) lbs. and with no significant
difference the group from Feed B possessed and average carcass weight of
191.2 (±11.62) lbs. Dressing percentage showed no statistical difference as both
groups recorded an average of 79.5% lean. There were no significant differences
between groups for loin eye area, 10th rib fat, or yield grades of the carcasses.


Sure looks like FEED B the cheaper one is a less expense way for farmers to get very similar results at a large savings..


https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=etds

Thanks again for helping the scammers valid the company's product