QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[As I See It]

I couldn't let this one go by. The passage you have quoted is from a July 2014 test while my post highlights a later test in Sept. of 2014. It should be emphasized that ATS ( a division of Cannon Instrument Co ) is an independent third party brought in to do the testing.

Subsequent testing by ATS in September 2014 demonstrated viscosity reductions of 8% to 23% depending on flow rates and crude oil types in transit. In its summary report, ATS concluded that i) data indicated a decrease in viscosity of crude oil flowing through the TransCanada pipeline due to AOT treatment of the crude oil; and ii) the power supply installed on our equipment would need to be increased to maximize reduction in viscosity and take full advantage of the AOT technology. While more testing is required to establish the efficacy of our AOT technology, we are encouraged by the findings of these field tests performed under commercial operating conditions. We look forward to further development and commercialization of our technology.

Let me be clear. I am disputing your claim that the SCIENCE behind the AOT can't work because of some law of nature known only to you and that crude oil is non polar. If the AOT reduces viscosity but fails as a commercial product that means the science was good but the engineering was flawed. This test proved the science and failed the engineering. The viscosity reduction proves your theories to be wrong whether or not the test as a whole was successful.


P.S. Please reread your post #55973 and tell me how you aren't saying what I said and helping to corroborate my statement.