It's good that you see there's a lot to unpack. We have very different views on Humbl and seeing the differences helps us figure out why. Maybe one of us will change our view.
I see you reference the filings and that you truly believe that Foote doesn't take more than $1 per year from Humbl. So you must believe he was wealthy before he started Humbl or has another source of income. You'll agree that it would be rough to live on $1 per year. Do you truly believe that Brian takes no money from Humbl for his personal use, and where do you think he gets his money to live and buy NFTs?
For me, I've seen enough OTC companies to know that what is in the filings isn't always clean or accurate. I believe, for example, that the money for that $400,000 Blue NFT came indirectly from Humbl investors. You have enormous faith in the filings in OTC companies while I don't believe OTC companies deserve that high level of trust.
But we can agree that there have been failures at Humbl and that maybe the price was too high at $7.92. You believe Foote is learning lessons (I'll point out he's learning them at the expense of shareholders) and you believe that he's on the right path. I don't see it but that's my opinion.
I'll agree with you that it's hard to change an industry. If that's where there's money, maybe spending money to change that industry is worthwhile. I see Foote spent a lot of shareholder money, but I don't have a good gauge on how he was able to change the industry so far. With hardly anyone on the Humbl platform, it doesn't appear to me that the money was well spent at all.
If Foote has really added some actual value in the past three years, it would be worthwhile for him to effectively communicate that value to investors so that blind people such as myself can see.
