InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 120
Posts 6397
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/25/2006

Re: tdbowieknife post# 80047

Saturday, 01/20/2024 12:45:52 PM

Saturday, January 20, 2024 12:45:52 PM

Post# of 81711
That worked, thanks again...

If I was a betting man I'd say that their defense is full of holes, their offices
may have been vacated but if they refused mail at their personal address
that leads me to think they were aware of what was going on and tried
sticking their heads in the sand hoping it would go away.

I'd be willing to bet that there were many Emails throughout the process
and we all know that digital does not go away, even message board post.
I'm curious as to what their next move would be, I personally see them liable
but my opinion means squat, the judge should have everything in front of him
and any reasonable person would come to the same conclusion.

Your thoughts based on what you have read so far?

Redhawk being awarded the claim or N95 not being held liable for the
arbitrators findings and judgement by the JAMS proceedings.

D_DOG

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.