Thank you for the docs, for some reason the Doc 25-1 wasn't available.
I've read a lot of info on this particular case and from what I surmised was
that N-95 has zero ground to stand on according to the rules set forth
in the mutually signed contract:
The Arbitration provision in the Sales and Purchase Agreement between the parties states:
If a claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the
performance or non-performance of obligations, the quality or
appropriateness of the Products, such dispute shall be determined by final
and binding arbitration before either the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation
Service (“JAMS”) or, alternatively, ADR Services, Inc. (“ADR”). The
arbitration will be conducted at a location determined by the Arbitrator in
Louisiana and shall be administered by and in accordance with either the
then existing JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures or
alternatively, ADR’s Arbitration Rules. In rendering the award, the arbitrator
shall determine the rights and obligations of the Parties according to the
substantive and procedural laws of Louisiana. Neither Party, however, will
be precluded from obtaining provisional relief, including but not limited to
attachment, in any court of competent jurisdiction. Judgment may be entered
upon the arbitrator’s award by any court having jurisdiction. Should either
Party refuse or neglect to appear or participate in the arbitration proceeding,
the arbitrator is empowered to decide the claim or controversy in accordance
with the evidence presented.
PS The JAMS court also sent everything to everyone concerned along
with Redhawks legal team
As stated above N-95 has nothing to stand on....
D_DOG
