Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[logic-commonsense]

You’re arguing a different point. This doesn’t show that Sharp made the original statement that there would not be a reverse split with the intent to deceive. It shows that later down the line, his position changed and he didn’t advise shareholders of the changed position until afterwards. Could that be a separate basis for the civil case - not sure. But it doesn’t show he made the initial statement with intent to deceive.