USSE-CYBR related: From the Raging Bull EFTI board:
By: rgw11
23 Apr 2006, 02:31 PM EDT
JR, what can you tell us about this soy sauce.
Msg. 32425 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32423 by rgw11.)
Jump to msg. #
By: jhrivera13
23 Apr 2006, 03:41 PM EDT
Not just soy
biofuel for diesel, turbines and gasoline engines
web site will have all details after all patents are finished approx. 58 patents. Totally new tech
- - - - -
Msg. 32426 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32425 by jhrivera13.)
Jump to msg. #
By: milesstandishproud
23 Apr 2006, 03:49 PM EDT
JH. It really sounds exciting. I am looking forward to hearing more.
Thanks for coming on here and sharing. I just got through listening once again to Dr. Lassoie's comments, and he really adds a whole new level of credibility, one that I think would garner a lot more investment here.
I certainly hope that EFTI is the right place to be to support these initiatives. It's hard to figure out right now.
When do you think we will get to know some more details as it pertains to EFTI and this technology?
Msg. 32428 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32425 by jhrivera13.)
Jump to msg. #
By: robnjr
23 Apr 2006, 04:06 PM EDT
Mr Rivera:
Excellent....as a long time EFTI shareholder (and trader, I'll admit), how will WE at EFTI benefit from this?????
Msg. 32429 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32426 by milesstandishproud.)
Jump to msg. #
jhrivera13
23 Apr 2006, 04:07 PM EDT
efti/castcrete is very exciting
and js has done a great job making this happen
in my opinion it will do very well, I know nothing about cement but I know js very well. My money is on him.
This tech will be owned by USSEC/CYBR as well as all patents we will have world exposure shortly.
Msg. 32433 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32429 by jhrivera13.)
Jump to msg. #
By: milesstandishproud
23 Apr 2006, 04:45 PM EDT
jh...."This tech will be owned by USSEC/CYBR as well as all patents we will have world exposure shortly."
But as EFTI holders, we should dang well get a big piece of the new CYBR pie. I don't see how existing CYBR should possibly be entitled to a bigger stake than EFTI holders. That would be a travesty. The way I see it, existing CYBR shareholders will probably be R/S to the stoneage before EFTI affects the merger with them. After all, it is EFTI that owns the patents, CYBR is just an unrelated shell at this point.
If anyone cares to correct me where I am wrong, I would welcome it.
Msg. 32435 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32433 by milesstandishproud.)
Jump to msg. #
By: robnjr
23 Apr 2006, 05:08 PM EDT
Miles:
""But as EFTI holders, we should dang well get a big piece of the new CYBR pie""
Agreed....I think there will be much to answer for if EFTI shareholders are not the largest beneficiaries of this technology.....
- - - - -
Msg. 32434 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32433 by milesstandishproud.)
Jump to msg. #
By: milesstandishproud
23 Apr 2006, 04:48 PM EDT
I would also expect the CYBR symbol to change to something like USSE, if that's not already taken...or something like that.
Msg. 32439 of 34294
(This msg. is a reply to 32434 by milesstandishproud.)
Jump to msg. #
By: jhrivera13
23 Apr 2006, 05:43 PM EDT
I agree
