InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 1664
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2022

Re: learningcurve2020 post# 659088

Monday, 12/25/2023 7:03:28 PM

Monday, December 25, 2023 7:03:28 PM

Post# of 708449
LC,

I wish you a joyful and peaceful holiday season!

I regret to inform you that I ran your statement through the AI bs detector and it was identified as bs:


“This statement contains several speculative elements and assumptions, lacking factual accuracy or evidenced validity. Here are a few reasons why this statement is largely nonsensical and baseless:

1. **Lack of Context and Specificity**: The statement lacks clear context and specific information about the trial, the entities involved (like "Senti," "UCLA," "Powers," "NWBO").

2. **Speculative Nature**: The statement includes speculative assertions about motivations and actions of various parties involved in a clinical trial. These speculations are not backed by evidence and are presented as possibilities rather than established facts.

3. **Conspiracy Implications**: Suggesting that entities are deliberately not wanting a name to be associated with a trial due to fear of adverse events or for intellectual property negotiations implies a level of conspiracy which generally lacks credibility without substantial evidence.

4. **Clinical Trial Processes**: The statement misunderstands or oversimplifies the complex nature of clinical trials, particularly regarding control over adverse events and intellectual property negotiations. Clinical trials are subject to rigorous regulatory oversight, and adverse events are an expected part of the trial process, not a reason to exclude names or entities.

5. **Inherent Uncertainty in Clinical Research**: The statement that a larger trial would be required is one of the few reasonable elements, as it’s common in clinical research to require larger studies for definitive conclusions. However, this is framed within a speculative narrative.

Overall, the statement seems to mix elements of fact with speculation and unverified assertions about the intentions and actions of various parties involved in clinical research. Without clear evidence or a more detailed understanding of the context, the statement appears to be more of a personal conjecture than a scientifically or factually grounded assertion.”

—ChatGPT



https://brownneurosurgery.com/breakthrough-brain-cancer-vaccine/

https://www.uclahealth.org/news/fda-approval-brain-cancer-alzheimers

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/northwest-biotherapeutics-announces-that-a-marketing-authorization-application-has-been-submitted-to-the-uk-mhra-for-dcvax-l-for-glioblastoma-302021038.html
Bullish
Bullish

Believe carefully. This is the greatest and most powerful lesson that I have learned since arriving on Earth. Examine what you believe about yourself most importantly, and then believe carefully as you interact with the world.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News