NaturalShrimp Inc (SHMP)

[MFranny]

Did you interplead yourself? Did you file an objection? I reviewed the docket. I listened to the hearing. The answer to both questions is, "No, you did not." And in fact, nor did anyone else. Therefore, the hearing was a rubber stamp proceeding with no adverse party. Consequently, the Judge chose to bullshit with the attorneys and congratulate them on getting a deal done, instead of sua sponte scrutinizing the settlement. The standard was "fair and reasonable." What would the judge have relied upon to find the settlement was "unfair" and "unreasonable"? We've come full circle back to the original two questions. The answer: NOTHING.

Accordingly, please explain what you mean by "[w]hat exists today resembles nothing of waht was presented to the judge." The O/S at the time of Series A issuance was approximately 85,000,000 common shares, the Joint Settlement 5 years later, conveyed 93,000,000 common shares to NSH shareholders. That's what the Complaint sought and that's what was agreed. What are you relying upon to argue that this is NOT fair and reasonable?

IMO, there was nothing wrong with the proceeding, if a wrong does exist, then it arose subsequent to the case and because NSI failed and continues to fail to cancel the Series A. I've said this ad nauseam. Circumstantial evidence supports this interpretation. See the YOTA Merger Agreement which required the Series A to be cancelled upon consummation of the business transaction WITHOUT consideration for the shares.