So, lemme get this straight…. Your theory is that there are coincidentally still 4 companies but that the companies NOW are actually different companies that have “huge budgets” and “multi year contracts” whereas the original “small budget” companies just couldn’t afford DBMM’s (a infinitesimally small marketing company with only 4 contracts) services anymore…..
Hmmmmm…….
Well, I guess a bag holder who’s spent so much time believing a lie might have trouble swallowing the old pride and grasp at any straw that floats by, but we’ve got to explain away a few nuisances. Like how did “huge budgets” manage to result in less profit and a massive increased net loss? NET…..NOT gross….
Secondly, how did “huge budgets” AND “multi year contracts” not qualify to be required to have an associated 8k released? Since the company’s “being transparent” and all.
I like that you’re thinking outside the box, but the more outside you get, the closer you get to exposing this ugly charade for what it is.
A flat-Earther ALWAYS has another far-fetched, convenient excuse lined up. When the theory is tested with equipment and the earth is proven to be round, it’s the equipment’s fault because it wasn’t put together correctly. When it’s meticulously put together and still proves round, it’s because the equipment wasn’t calibrated correctly. When it’s calibrated and still proves round, it’s because the person calibrating it wasn’t certified. When all those hoops are jumped through and it still proves round, it’s because the atmosphere was unstable. And, finally, the test equipment is simply thrown away because it’s clearly unusable and the theory is just maintained.
That’s A WHOLE LOT like trying to explain DBMM as a successful company being run by a competent, successful CEO, isn’t it?
You longs should be (and have EVERY right to be) supremely PISSED right now. Those numbers in the 10k along with NO 8k’s to provide any further guidance in the interim is really a sledgehammer to the gut.
Man, Linda screwed y'all ROYALLY. smh
