InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,005.21
(
-0.37%
)
Post# of 221942
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

trade15

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 24
Posts 2194
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/02/2001

trade15

Member Level

Re: janice shell post# 216959

Sunday, 11/19/2023 12:20:51 AM

Sunday, November 19, 2023 12:20:51 AM

Post# of 221942
I don't know about now but in the past on the Vancouver and Calgary exchanges Chelekis and Gump weren't entirely wrong about naked shorting. Their problem was that they didn't take into account that everyone was doing it including company insiders . No one worried about covering by a set date. They would either create paper in the future or cover when the stock was dead and buried. Then consolidate the shell and do it all over again. This post will most likely cause some eyes to roll.

trade15
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up