There's something else that I wanted to say to you in that last reply I made but I think I forgot...
You sounded as tho you were contradicting yourself... Here's why...
"Now what I will say is I believe that Emil and others within the company are taking advantage of the situation they have created for sole purpose of enriching themselves."
I hate to tell you but to make that statement and at the same time say no way lord Emu could be scamming.......wwwwwell......pardon me but I'm sure that many ppl would agree that is a conflicting thing to say. It just doesn't jive. That amounts pretty closely to fraud and when added to the fact that he was indeed found guilty of breach of fiduciary duty AND UNJUST SELF ENRICHMENT by a jury of his peers......
and add to that how he twice sued Cameron and promised publicly to take the trial to the end and then walked out on both trials on the 1st day when Cameron showed him proof.......wwwell.....not too cool.........and later he promised that he had found computer meta data that proved cameron had changed the dates on his evidence that showed when he, Cameron, had written the script......oh, and then there was the time he hired his brother to run his nightclub even after the reports (that I posted the newspaper article here several times) said that his bro was a convicted or known pimp. That's an honest and forthright man?
He says also that he's a co-founder of Thorne bio medical doing years of cancer research in Germany. Maybe so. But I did extensive research on this and could not find a single word anywhere on the internet to show that company even exists. The funny part is there IS an American company by the exact same name that does cancer work and he is not associated with that. How to explain this? Show me any evidence whatsoever that there is a company by that name that he is a co-founder of. What is it....a secret company?
And where are his operas? And where are his children's books?
But forget about all that and just go by your own statement above where you accuse him of self enrichment at the cost of his shareholders and how that equates to him not being scam capable. If you backpedal it will only look worse.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
