Reverse Mergers & Low Float Plays

[Potse]

MSAH/INNI...Tailored Tickers shells......

Like that one. Been accumulating INNI myself. Same custo.

MSAH and INNI are my two favorites of the shells that David currently owns. Although I have not yet established a position in the INNI shell, I would be very comfortable owning a nice position at these sub-2 cent levels.

What I like about both of these shells is that David has given us (via the Tailored Tickers X account: https://twitter.com/TailoredTickers) a pretty good idea of what the legacy share picture will look like in a reverse merger. He has stated that in both of these shells significant blocks of existing shares will move with the change in control. 7M shares in MSAH, leaving that shell with a little over 6.9M legacy shares. 5M shares in INNI, leaving that shell with a little over 17.6M legacy shares. It makes it so much easier for a retail shareholder to more accurately analyze/evaluate a shell when the shell owner provides this kind of information.

Granted, the legacy share picture we see today could change dramatically when a reverse merger agreement is actually reached in either of these shells. For example, David could decide to issue himself additional shares to compensate for the shell expenses and his services, or if he just wants to retain a higher percentage of the post-merger company. In that scenario, I would obviously need to reevaluate my analysis and potentially adjust my price expectations accordingly. But as things stand at the present moment in time, both MSAH and INNI look like they are setup for some potentially very nice returns for the retail shareholders. Right now I think it is completely reasonable to have a minimum expectation of getting around a 5-bagger on each of these shells.

The reason I have initially focused my purchases on MSAH is because this shell does have the advantage of a timely 15-12G filing and the ability to get a name/symbol change passed through with less difficulty than INNI can. In a situation like INNI and other shells that did not get their 15-12G filings done in a timely fashion, the shell owner would need to find a RM target that would be willing to accept the current name/symbol or would be willing to go through the process of becoming a full SEC-filer again. So my thinking is that MSAH might be a somewhat more attractive shell for any potential reverse merger target, and that might make it slightly easier for David to find a suitable RM.

INNI does have a name (Innovaro) that is attractive/suitable enough that I think there are potential RM targets that would be willing to work with it if they did not want to go down the route of becoming an SEC-filer. It is a name that would be an applicable fit in a variety of industries. If Ben Berry was able to find a buyer for the OPUS shell (OPUS MAGNUM AMERIS, INC), I am confident that David will be able to find a buyer for the INNI shell.