Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

What a pile of BULL SHIT.

1. $DBMM hiring auditors to

BFD. MOst companies hire auditors

2. $DBMM filling the SUPER 10K to

FIling a "super 10K" isn't the mark of good company. Filing a "Super 10K" means a company SCREWED UP and missed filings - Like DBMM missed almost THREE YEARS of filings in a ROW.

3. $DBMM keeping current in Qs and Ks to

Most companies keep current on filings! If they don't the SEC calls them out - as DBMM found out!

4. $DBMM getting APPROVAL from SEC Corp FIN to

In fact, to this DAY, there's no record of COrp Fins EVER giving DBMM any "approval". They STILL think DBMM did not abide by the regs of properly forming a "super 10K"

5. $DBMM WINNING the Initial Decision from SEC Admin Law Judge to

DBMM NEVER won the ID from Foelack. The Coard of Commissioners NEVER gave finalized the ID. The SEC itself dismissed the OIP after "Internal Errors".

6. $DBMM getting APPROVAL by a Market Maker GLED to
7. $DBMM filling Form 211 by a Market Maker GLED to
8. $DBMM getting APPROVAL by FINRA on Form 211 to

FINRA does NOT APPROVE companies. It says EXACTLY THAT on their website, dummy! They approved the 211 after GLED submitted it.

9. $DBMM getting APPROVAL by OTC Markets and dropping CE to

OTC Markets doesn't "APPROVE" companies. They dropped the CE because the reason for it being there were no longer relevant.

10. $DBMM WINNING THE BIGGEST VERDICT IN OTC HISTORY by SEC Commissioners.

NO. There was no "Verdict". Almost 100 companies had their OIP's dismissed because of an "INTERNAL ERROR" on the part of the SEC. Need a LINK That proves it?? One can be provided.

Just more "Blah Blah Blah" throughout your WHOLE POST.

You've always been right, eh? How about when you said that Samantha Williams wasn't "authorized" to file the petition for review"??? HAHAHAHA! It sure lasted A LONG TIME for an "unathorized filing".

How about when you said that Samantha Williams would be FIRED for filing the review? She STILL works for the SEC.