The board poster stated, “Just heard from Greg in a email, it's been months thought he disappeared....” Nice try. You posted a link from Greg on this site on 10/7, which was 12 days prior to this post, as well as other links prior to that. These links could only have come from Greg. Once again, telling simple falsehoods such as this one, places everything else you post in question. Halpern’s attempt to begin this post with a disclaimer designed to protect the board poster didn’t work. Even then, if Halpern is sending emails to this individual, which are then being posted online, the board poster is acting in concert with Halpern, which is a breach of the court order.
“He's been working for legitimate MAXD shareholders....” How do you know this? Because Halpern told you he was? With his track record for ignoring the truth, you still expect anyone to believe you? Greg Halpern has been working for himself, which is what he has always done, not the “legitimate” shareholders, whatever that means. Anyone who bought MAXD stock, or traded stock for services, is a legitimate shareholder. Halpern has been working to attempt to build a lawsuit against the man who stopped giving him money. Why? Because he has none and he wants Harvey’s money. He will use the shareholders in an attempt to get money for himself because he has no way to get it from Vechery on his own. Halpern has already defaulted on too many notes for Vechery to willingly give him any more.
The board poster screams out “TAX EVASION!!!!,” with four exclamation marks. That “will be considered” in the lawsuit. Tax evasion is a claim which can only be determined by the IRS, not Greg Halpern. For that matter, I suspect Halpern is an expert in tax evasion. I doubt Harvey Vechery, or anyone on his legal team, has opened his books to Greg Halpern. As to the reason for tax losses or tax evasion, who was responsible for the shambles that is MAXD? Why wouldn’t there be a tax loss associated with MAXD? For anyone who bought stock for that matter. All the company did was lose money. There were no earnings! EVER!!!! And that statement deserves four exclamation marks. Greg Halpern was the man in charge, Vechery only supplied the money that Halpern burned. For all that went wrong with MAXD, the finger always points to the man in charge. The decisions maker. Not the banker. That would be Greg Halpern.
“According to GH, it takes 45 steps to bury someone like Harvey Vechery.... Greg is on step 38....” 45 steps? What are you talking about? Instead of posting cryptic remarks about 45 Pleiadean steps needed to bury his former angel investor, Greg Halpern needs to focus on those 12 known steps to recovery that are posted everywhere for all in need to study and practice.
“MAXD shareholders will be able to join this lawsuit... A lawsuit estimated as a loss to MAXD shareholders, or what Harvey Vechery has cost MAXD shareholders, since this charade begun!!!! $30million!!!!” Thirty million dollars? That’s about $7-1/2 million per exclamation mark! Tell me Greg, what forensic genius came up with that number? The same one who placed a dollar value on your short squeeze scam? The same one who assembled the astronomically impossible mining numbers? The same one who came up with a $57m valuation of the Mexican Land Deal? The Beluga Whale car numbers? The “quadrillion dollar” MAXD Proprietary Mineral Mapping Technology, gold mines, and gold back currency deals? Need I go on? The point is Halpern just pulled some number out of his hat and said Harvey cost the shareholders these losses. Poppycock. MAXD was not profitable. MAXD had zero earnings. Harvey Vechery provided money for many years and never took anything out. Vechery was not involved in the decision-making process. $30 million dollars? Give your head a shake. Greg Halpern willfully took money from Harvey Vechery and provided no revenue or profit in return. And Halpern thinks Vechery owes him?
As I’ve been saying for the last two years, Greg Halpern needs money. He can’t make it the old-fashioned way, by earning it, so he will attempt to sue Harvey Vechery for his money. Sue for a fat number and attempt to settle for less. It’s an old story, one I assume the Vechery legal team will be more than happy to fight.
“A couple months Greg will forward the info and I'll post it so any legitimate shareholder will be able to join the suit!!!!.” Once again, this was the plan all along. Sue the man with the money. The problem is you have to provide “legitimate” reasons for a court of law to decide in your favor and “he’s got money, and I don’t” is not on the list.
“I posted the beginning of Harvey Vechery's woes yesterday.... Nonsuit!!!!” An intentional non-suit is not a “woe,” it is a change in legal strategy. A woe would be a large note in default and no way to pay it.
“This was Harvey Vechery's plan all along, use MAXD as a tax loss write-off!!!!” Rubbish. Harvey Vechery did not invest to lose money. Nor did any other shareholder. Halpern convinced him he would make “quadrillions” of dollars investing with him. His last proposal was entitled “Making Harvey Richer” and was based on Vechery giving Halpern more money so Harvey could make more money. Otherwise, Halpern would have named his promotion “Making Harvey Vechery Another Tax Write-Off.” With four exclamation marks. As I’ve stated before. If Harvey Vechery wanted a tax write off, there are much cleaner, easier, less stressful, and less embarrassing ways to make tax decisions than dumping the money down a MAXD rabbit hole. I’m sure there are many charities waiting for Harvey Vechery’s money. Harvey has a write-off only because Greg Halpern siphoned off his money while failing to have any earnings at MAXD so there was no return on Vechery’s investment.
“Everyone been booing Greg Halpern whereas he's been fighting for this company and his invested $95Million....Say what you want, but the real villain in this case is and has always been Harvey Vechery!!!!” Greg Halpern has been fighting for himself his entire life. Even though the $95m figure was corrected to $5m, that number is also questionable. Taking loans from Vechery to pay MAXD bills, then issuing loans to the company at high interest rates and claiming that as Halpern’s investment back into the company, is a bit unethical. Especially since it was Harvey’s money in the first place.
MAXD never had any revenue deals. It never completed developing a product. Halpern burned every contact the company had due to his arrogant attitude. Halpern’s intentional move to the Expert Market killed MAXD for all shareholders, legitimate and illegitimate, and that includes Harvey Vechery. The long finger of blame is aimed at Greg Halpern and any court of law will eventually make that determination.
