InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 13110
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: fung_derf post# 125009

Monday, 10/23/2023 2:59:45 PM

Monday, October 23, 2023 2:59:45 PM

Post# of 133993
No, it not "a great example"... It's a far different story and situation. This wipers thing has been brought up and discussed here numerous times. If you think it's the same thing, that's fine. I don't. I've explained all that here before.

Besides, it has no bearing whatsoever on my conclusion that there are no infringements and the patents are useless. I've explained enough times, in great detail, my basis for that conclusion. It has nothing to do with wipers or companies stalling or invalid patents or slow courts or anything along any of those lines, even tho ppl keep ascribing those reasons to me, as though I have ever used them to explain my sentiments about vplm and the value of the patents. Nothing whatsoever. My conclusions are based on well thought out inferences and dot connecting. It's the same as how we know almost everything there is to know about atoms, via inference rather than direct observation.

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News