InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 125
Posts 7318
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/03/2017

Re: rockie101 post# 188538

Tuesday, 10/17/2023 6:52:21 PM

Tuesday, October 17, 2023 6:52:21 PM

Post# of 197821
rockie - I don't know anymore than you and am just speculating, but I believe Charles is trying to separate all valuable IP from ENZC & it's lawsuits. Like I've pointed out many times over the past few months, we've seen an obvious and noticable change in the way he releases PR's (All used to come out as ENZC, then mention the subs, now they come out under Subs themselves, specifically). If and when the time comes for Charles to disclose something big/significant (C3 cured HIV, C7 or other mABS cures plandemic-19, some other IP they have cures MS, etc...etc...etc...), I don't believe he'll disclose any of it until those subs are no longer under ENZC. In other words, I don't believe he wants the value they'll bring to fall under ENZC. I believe he wants that value to specifically fall under BGEN and/or VIRO, but once they're not longer under ENZC.

We have ask ourselves what changed that derailed the plan we were led to believe was happening for 2.5+ years? ENZC was supposed to be audited, I don't believe for a second that Gries isn't finished with 2022 yet. Once audited they were supposed to got SEC Reporting and #uplist, which was supposed to bring in the bigtime partnership talks, institutional investors, etc... Now, they're remaining on pinks per Charles, so no SEC reporting, and they're selling the majority of their disruptive tech/IP to a "bottom of the barrel" SPAC for only $450M? 2 years ago Charles told us that conservatively C3 by itself would bring in roughly $9.09B per year (and that was just C3). They're selling Saga almost everything (except robusomed) for roughly 5% (450M) of that? I really don't know what's going on, but it seems to me that Charles is trying to separate BGEN/VIRO from ENZC as quickly as he can.