InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 262
Posts 11469
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2009

Re: Cornerstone_Marketing post# 108971

Monday, 10/09/2023 8:22:42 PM

Monday, October 09, 2023 8:22:42 PM

Post# of 111691
Wouldn't it have benefited Mark and Shareholders more if Mark would have held out for a higher MIKP share price before announcing a RS split with the full knowledge of what he was doing (to shareholders) before he did it. Since the RS split the price has dropped from .0007 to .0002 where we now are and possibly lower. A higher price (at reverse time) means a higher price out of the gate after the reverse stock split. WE WOULD HAVE GONE MUCH MUCH HIGHER IN PRICE IF MARK WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THIS THROUGH BEFORE MAKING HIS DECISION. IT WOULD HAVE ALSO BENEFITTED MARK IF SHAREHOLDERS WOULD HAVE HAD THEIR VOICE HEARD BEFORE A DECISON WAS MADE. MYSELF AND ONE OTHER PERSON GAVE MARK OUR OPINION WAY BEFORE THIS ANNOUNCEMENT BUT OBVIOUSLY HE WASN'T INTERESTED IN WHAT WE HAD TO SAY.

Does this mean that Mark is going toi defer using shares earlier for services to give the share price a chance to go up after the RS split.

Have a hard time with Mark's decision and it is in line with what he did in 2011. Just doesn't make sense to me. Tried to discuss this with Mark but he appears to skirt the issue.

Just my thoughts
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MIKP News