I have a vague memory of when reviews of recipes were more authentically about the recipe as written. (I.e. "I gave this 3.5 stars because the liquid called for was double the amount needed. I also think that the ratio of vegetables/meat/starch was off balance and think it would be a better dish with twice the amount of x". Maybe it's a false memory though...
Inevitably these days they're regularly 5 stars with changed/added/omitted ingredients, altered quantities and adjusted cooking times to the original recipe.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.