NaturalShrimp Inc (SHMP)

[eqinvestor]

I 100% agree that there was misrepresentation on the Series A. The judge was never told that the NSH shareholders actually owned a preferred at the time of the hearing and was not told what the terms of the preferred were. However, the attorney was an advocate as are all attorneys. Saying he was testifying under oath is legally incorrect which I believe you know. I do agree that the attorney could potentially have an issue if this was ever looked into. He didn't even disclose to the judge he was a NSH shareholder. However he has an out. It is a fact that the individual NSH shareholders never received their individual allotments. That is a fact.