Every time I go through the case history I see something else, N95's lawyers
are going to try their best to make a little dent in legitimacy of the Arbitration
Award.
When their client closed up shop and shut down their LLC that just might have
opened up those individuals to personal lawsuits.
Their lawyers will probably try to state that they never received copies of the
Arbitration hearing but both Redhawk and JAMS clearly debunks that along
with the contract being signed via DocuSign, all in the:
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND:
Contract Documents were signed via DocuSign, this is considered from what
I've read so far to be a binding contract at this point:
The Agreement was executed and mutually exchanged by use of the DocuSign platform, as indicated by the parties’ electronic signatures on Exhibit A. See 2/22/23
JAMS SENT NOTIFICATION TO ALL PARTIES:
$$$.This is a biggie, there is no possible way to defend their clients actions of
refusal of notification and ultimately then pull a Failure to Appear.$$$
On January 12, 2023, JAMS provided written notice to all parties of the scheduling of a final status teleconference on February 15, 2023, and also notice of the arbitration hearing on February 22, 2023.
On April 4, 2023, Order No. 5 was issued, noting that any response from N95 Shield would be due within 21 calendar days of RedHawk’s submission—which would be April 21, 2023 if there were no further submission of evidence before that date. Neither party made any further submission, and the hearing was declared closed in Order No. 6 dated April 24, 2023.
This is why I have a great feeling and looks like I'll just sit
back and watch things unfold day by day.
D_DOG
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
