InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2983
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: EternalPatience post# 765347

Friday, 09/01/2023 2:12:50 AM

Friday, September 01, 2023 2:12:50 AM

Post# of 795767
The Request For Input was related to pricing, not the ERCF which is based on the international standard Basel Framework. So, it will never change. Get over it, pro se plaintiff. You and your more than 30 different ID's that you use on this board.
It was not a Proposed Rule, so it wasn't published on the Federal Register.
Then, we don't have to wait "4 more weeks", which is what it takes for the Publication Date on the Federal Register, had it been a Final Rule approved at an effective date.
You are always posting flawed analyses with Rodney, Vankmike, Barron, etc, to make the reader's head spin, in an attempt to discredit all other valid analyses, at the same time you request a settlement of your flawed lawsuit with judge Sweeney.
An opportunity requested by the FHFA Dtr's hedge funds guard, to complain about the Capital Rule because they refuse to accept that the JPS dividend suspension is all about the recapitalization of FnF, not just for the rehabilitation of FnF, but later the goalpost changed for recapitalization to perfection, to fulfill the 2011 UST-HUD's "recommendations on ending the conservatorships" at the request of the Dodd-Frank Law, with a Privatized Housing Finance System (Adoption of Basel Framework)
Financial illiterate attorneys can't understand the existence of financial instruments created just for capital adequacy matters, like a JPS. The reason why they are recorded in the Core Capital and Additional Tier 1 Capital (AT1) for the Capital ratio (soundness)
The Equity holders have suffered Regulatory Risk, as the capital ratios are remarkably higher than 2008 (For instance, 258% higher in the Risk-Based Capital requirement in Freddie Mac; let alone the Minimum Capital Level, from 0.45% to 2.5% of the off-balance sheet obligations -MBS Trusts-)

Goldman Sachs and Co want to keep at least one of them to continue the current extortion of the resources out of them, with good deals for the investment banks: sale of NPL and RPL, PMI claim pardoned, etc.
The Public-Private partnerships with RTC that saddled the taxpayer with a $30B loss in its investment in RefCORP bonds with the bailout of the FHLBanks in 1989, a scheme spearheaded by DeMarco and Sandra Thompson at the time, that saw an opportunity to use FnF to make up for the losses.