InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2167
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/13/2017

Re: JustGoDeep post# 319951

Tuesday, 08/15/2023 5:33:07 PM

Tuesday, August 15, 2023 5:33:07 PM

Post# of 330361
Well let's take a closer look shall we...
"Ten years ago, when that request for proposals went out from DARPA, Bioelectronics Corp. had been around for over a decade."
Bioelectronics Corp. was incorporated in 2000. So absolutely true.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BIEL/profile

"They had an FDA cleared device for twelve years at that point."
Actiband was cleared for marketing by the FDA in August of 2002. So, absolutely true.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?id=K022404

"They haven't developed a new product in decades"
There current product was cleared using the Actiband as a predicate device to which the current product was deemed "substantially Equivalent". In other words the Actipatch is essentially the same device as the Actiband.
Ok, I'm stretching a little here, but not much. The FDA considers the products to be equivalent.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/K152432.pdf

I believe that the rest was opinion, so neither true nor false. On balance I judge that the accused post was a mostly accurate representation of the truth.

On the other side...
"What A TOTAL Misrepresentation Of The Truth."
This statement has been shown to be a complete falsehood.

But of course I am a little biased.

" There are two ways to be fooled : one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe what is true ," Kierkegaard