Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Poo28]

Your revisionist history with fellow NEVERS always wrong and your opinions that claim you are right but attorneys, Judges, industry guidelines , supporters in general with facts , are ALL irrespective of their gravitas and professional credentials, are wrong.

Shareholders know who I am and share my support of DBMM. We are very pleased with the Company direction and management. We know who you are though with for 8,000 posts plus IM. So over 10,000 .

Lies do not work, example correction that indeed Restricted shares were issued by DBMM.
See Post 318142 below :

Shareholders know when you bashers are corrected with facts, you just keep blathering misinformation . Speaking of lying, that would be you Dude. The shares were issued Restricted as that is the process. See OTCM end-June report and 3Qfiling. Better learn SEC Instructions and Regulations . More obnoxious name calling. And speaking of facts.

Facts:
1. Aged debt in June cleared with 30million shares RESTRICTED. So stated on OTCM end of month report for June as restricted following legal review. Reported in 3Q 23 Subsequent Events. That concluded DBMM role.

2. Lender can have legend removed and free trading shares issued with a legal opinion which documents all requirements under Rule 144. DBMM has no role here. According to OTCM shares reissued free trading in July.

You have no evidence shares are being sold. Only an idiot would sell while bashers are depressing pps with BS. IMO lender cleared to deposit into his brokerage account to hold.

This is fifth time I have corrected you in this matter. All facts above documented.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172522653

Summary:
DBMM issued restricted shares under Aged Debt being removed from balance sheet after legal review. Listed on OTCM end of month report as Restricted.

Other party to aged debt removal provided Legal Opinion to reissue as free trading . The legal opinion would include the fact that the Rule 144 criteria was met. DBMM has nothing to do with this aspect. Clearance must meet legal criteria and is documented.

IMO the party to the agreement is not selling shares at a depressed price . He is not stupid. Merely depositing cleared shares into
His account as an asset under management like any thinking shareholder. Just my opinion .

Bashers are bullies and their opinions are irrelevant against documented facts. Shareholders want facts and DBMM provided.